Norbert Gombos vs Tristan Lamasine Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When considering second serve performance over the past six months, Gombos has a slight edge with 47.35% of points won compared to Lamasine’s 43.51%.
• In recent return game stats, Gombos wins 47.78% of opponents' second serves, whereas Lamasine achieves 43.94%. On first serve returns, Lamasine, at 28.33%, slightly surpasses Gombos’s 26.16%.
• Can under pressure performance predict a winner? Lamasine has saved more breakpoints recently, with a rate of 57.1%, versus Gombos's 51.09%.
• Overall performance in the last 12 months shows Gombos winning 59.42% of his matches, slightly outperforming Lamasine's 54.39% win rate.
• Each player excels on different surfaces; Gombos favors Clay with a 59% win rate, while Lamasine is stronger on Hard courts, boasting a 58% win rate.
• In terms of competition level, Gombos frequently competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments and has a 59.68% win rate, while Lamasine mostly plays in Futures/Satellites, achieving a 65.63% win rate.
• Their head-to-head record is tied, with each player winning two matches. Notably, Gombos has won more sets overall, leading 5 to 4.
• In tie-break scenarios, Gombos has the advantage, winning two out of three tiebreakers played against Lamasine.
• Against similarly ranked opponents over the last year, both players have faced competition with an average rank around 387, indicating a comparable level of opponent caliber.
• Regarding break point conversion, Gombos is more effective recently, converting 38.81% of opportunities compared to Lamasine’s 32.42%.

Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent statistics provides an insightful look into both players' current form and performance trends. Gombos exhibits a minor advantage when considering second serve performance and efficiency in returning opponents' second serves.

However, Lamasine shows resilience under pressure by saving a higher percentage of break points. Considering the overall head-to-head results, both players have shown competitiveness, but Gombos leads slightly in sets won.

Surface performance skews to each player's strengths, with Gombos performing better on clay and Lamasine preferring hard courts. This match scenario, however, transcends surface preference due to their equal head-to-head standing.

Taking into account the players' performance trends and strengths, Gombos is predicted to have a slight edge in this upcoming match. His stronger second serve performance and set-winning capability against Lamasine may prove decisive.